Overview For this Performance Task Assessment, you will develop a narrated PowerPoint presentation explaining the levels of evidence in selected peer-reviewed articles and the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Please contact Assignment Samurai for help with EB003 Summative Assessment or any other course. Email: assignmentsamurai@gmail.com Submission Length: A 6- to 7-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation. Your response to this Assessment should:

• Reflect the criteria provided in the Rubric.
• Adhere to the required assignment length.

This Assessment requires submission of one (1) file, a narrated PowerPoint presentation. Save your file as EB003_presentation_firstinitial_lastname (for example, EB003_presentation_J_Smith). Instructions Access the following to complete this Assessment:

• APA Presentation Template

Before submitting your Assessment, carefully review the rubric. This is the same rubric the Assessor will use to evaluate your submission and it provides detailed criteria describing how to achieve or master the Competency. Many students find that understanding the requirements of the Assessment and the rubric criteria help them direct their focus and use their time most productively. To complete this Assessment:

• Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry. (Note: You are required to focus on the same clinical issue of interest in the competencies EB002–EB006.)
• Develop a PICOT question to address your clinical issue of interest.
• Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.

Create a 6- to 7-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:

• Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
• Describe how you developed your PICOT question focused on your chosen clinical issue of interest.
• Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
• Provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
• Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
• Explain the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.