Overview
For this Performance Task Assessment, you will develop a narrated Clinical Inquiry PowerPoint Presentation describing your search process for locating research on a clinical issue of interest and complete a Research Methodology Matrix in which you will analyze the research methodologies described in selected peer-reviewed articles.
Please contact Assignment Samurai for help with EB002 Summative Assessment or any other course.
Email: assignmentsamurai@gmail.com
Submission Length: A two-part Assessment: 1) A 4- to 5-slide narrated Clinical Inquiry PowerPoint presentation and 2) A 1- to 2-page Research Methodology Matrix.
Your response to this Assessment should:
- Reflect the criteria provided in the rubric.
- Identify a clinical issue of interest that can form the basis of a clinical inquiry.
- Keep in mind that it is required that your chosen clinical issue of interest will remain the same for all competencies (EB002–EB006).
- Using keywords related to this clinical issue of interest and Boolean search terms, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four peer-reviewed articles relevant to your clinical issue of interest.
- Create a 4- to 5-slide narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
- Identify and briefly describe your chosen clinical issue of interest.
- Describe how you used keywords and Boolean search terms to search your chosen clinical issue of interest.
- Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search.
- Provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
- Use the Research Methodology Matrix to analyze the methodologies applied in each of the four peer-reviewed articles. Your analysis should include the following (in 1–2 pages)
- The full citation of each peer-reviewed article, in APA format.
- A brief (1 paragraph) statement explaining why you chose each peer-reviewed article and/or how it relates to your clinical issue of interest, including a brief explanation of the ethics of research related to your clinical issue of interest.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the aims of the research of each peer-reviewed article.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the research methodology used. Be sure to identify if the methodology used was qualitative, quantitative, or a mixed-methods approach. Be specific and provide examples.
- A brief (1- to 2-paragraph) description of the strengths of each of the research methodologies used, including reliability and validity of how the methodology was applied in each of the peer-reviewed articles that you selected.