Module Pre-Assessments are your opportunity to practice applying module content before final submission of your Competency Assessment. Please submit the pre-assessment with proper formatting as listed in your assessment instructions. For example, if a template is provided, it should be utilized. All written assessments should adhere to APA guidelines. Please contact Assignment Samurai for help with EB003 Pre-Assessment Submission or any other course. Email: assignmentsamurai@gmail.com   For your Module 2 Pre-Assessment, respond to the following prompts. These prompts match those in your final Assessment. Prompts: You will develop a narrated PowerPoint presentation explaining the levels of evidence in selected peer-reviewed articles and the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. To prepare:

• Review your PICOT question to address your clinical issue of interest.
• Using the keywords from the PICOT question, search at least four different databases in the Walden Library to identify at least four relevant peer-reviewed articles at the systematic-reviews level.

• Create a 6- to 7-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following:
  1. Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
  2. Provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected.
  3. Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected. Be specific and provide examples.
  4. Explain the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.

Once you submit your responses, assess yourself using the rubric provided. Use your Pre-Assessment submission and any feedback you may garner to improve and refine your responses. Use the following rubric to assess your response to the prompts:

Rubric Criteria	Does Not Meet Expectations	Meets Expectations	Exceeds Expectations
Create a 6- to 7-slide (total for all topics) narrated PowerPoint presentation that addresses the following: Identify the four research databases that you used to conduct your search for the peer-reviewed articles that you selected. Learning Objective 2.1: Describe databases used in conducting research for clinical issues	Response does not adequately describe four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.	Response adequately identifies at least four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.	Response accurately and clearly describes four research databases used to conduct a search for the peer-reviewed articles selected.
Provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected. Learning Objective 2.2: Apply proper APA citation to cite peer-reviewed research	Response does not adequately provide APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected.	Response adequately provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected.	Response accurately and completely provides APA citations for at least four peer-reviewed articles selected.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles that you selected. Be specific and provide examples. Learning Objective 2.3: Analyze levels of evidence in peer-reviewed research	Response does not adequately describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles selected. Response does not adequately synthesize or integrate resources that support the responses provided.	Response adequately describes the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles selected. Response adequately synthesizes and integrates resources that support the responses provided.	Response accurately and completely describes in detail the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles selected. Response synthesizes and integrates at least two outside resources that fully support the responses provided.
Explain the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research. Learning Objective 2.4: Analyze use of systematic reviews for clinical research	Response does not adequately explain the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.	Response adequately explains the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.	Response accurately and completely explains the strengths of using systematic reviews for clinical research.