Assessment Description:
Go back to your readings in Chapter 4 of the text on bias. Reread the information to help you answer this question.
Remember that bias can be found on a website.
View the website noted here: https://www.naturalchild.org/articles/guest/john_breeding.html.
What indications do you have that the site is biased or not biased? List three things that appear to make this site biased or unbiased. Finally, based on the criteria you have been learning about websites, do you believe this site is true and honest, or does it have an agenda? How might you address bias in your evaluation essay?
During the week, go back and review your classmates’ posts and discuss similarities and differences between your response and your peers’ responses.
Please contact Assignment Samurai for help with this or any other assignment.
Email: assignmentsamurai@gmail.com
SOLUTION to ENG-105: English Composition I - Topic 5 DQ 1.
SAMPLE 1
Hello class,
When examining bias in online sources, it is crucial to critically evaluate the information presented. After reviewing Chapter 4 of Writing with Purpose by Grand Canyon University (2022), I was in a better position to evaluate the article Does ADHD Even Exist by John Breeding. Upon doing so, I identified several indicators that suggest the site may have some inherent bias. First, the site presents a very strong and unwavering stance against psychiatric medication for children, with ADHD without acknowledging any potential benefits. As Grand Canyon University (2022) notes, "Bias is when a writer allows his or her personal opinions/views to cloud language or arguments". Secondly, the absolute language used on the site, such as calling psychiatric drugs " harmful," without evidence to support the argument indicates a lack of objectivity and a potential bias in the presentation of information.
Furthermore, the site does not appear to cite or link to any peer-reviewed scientific studies or data to support its claims. Instead, it relies heavily on anecdotes and personal Grand Canyon University (2022) emphasizes that credible sources should use expert opinions and statistics as support. Thus, the absence of such evidence-based support further suggests a biased perspective. Based on these factors, I believe this site likely has an agenda of discouraging the use of psychiatric medication in children, rather than presenting a balanced, objective view of the topic. While the authors may sincerely believe their position, the one-sided presentation and lack of scientific evidence suggest a significant bias in their approach.
To address bias in my own evaluation essay, I would implement several strategies. First, I would seek out multiple perspectives on my topic from a variety of credible sources to ensure a balanced view. I would also carefully examine my own potential biases and preconceptions to avoid unconsciously skewing my analysis. Additionally, I would clearly cite reputable sources to support any claims made in my essay. I am eager to know how you would address bias.
References
Breeding, J. (n.d.). Does ADHD even exist? The Natural Child project. https://www.naturalchild.org/articles/guest/john_breeding.html
Grand Canyon University (2022). Writing with purpose. (2nd ed.)